Towards Conscious AI: The Role of Computer Sciences in the Energy, Social, and Ethical Sustainability of Artificial Intelligence

Keywords: sustainability, energy efficiency, fairness, governance, artificial intelligence

Abstract

Artificial intelligence has transformed multiple sectors, but its rapid growth brings significant energy, environmental, social, and ethical challenges. To achieve true sustainability, computer science must integrate technical optimization, computational ethics, and social governance. On the energy side, key approaches include pruning, quantization, smaller models, greener infrastructures, and decentralized methods such as federated learning, which reduce consumption and emissions. Social and ethical sustainability requires frameworks that incorporate transparency, fairness, human values, and context-aware metrics to evaluate justice and explainability. Sustainable AI depends on combining energy efficiency with social responsibility, supported by future priorities such as social metrics, integrated auditing tools, renewable-aligned infrastructures, and participatory governance models.

Author Biography

Carlos M. Travieso-González, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria

Las Palmas de Gran Canaria-España, carlos.travieso@ulpgc.es

References

V. Bolón-Canedo, L. Morán-Fernández, B. Cancela, and A. Alonso-Betanzos, “A review of green artificial intelligence: Towards a more sustainable future,” Neurocomputing, vol. 599, p. 128096, Sep. 2024. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925231224008671

A. Tabbakh, L. Al Amin, M. Islam, G. M. Iqbal Mahmud, I. K. Chowdhury, and M. S. H. Mukta, “Towards sustainable AI: a comprehensive framework for Green AI,” Discov. Sustain., vol. 5, no. 1, Nov. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00641-4

R. Różycki, D. A. Solarska, and G. Waligóra, “Energy-aware machine learning models—A review of recent techniques and perspectives,” Energies, vol. 18, no. 11, p. 2810, May. 2025. https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/11/2810

B. Li, Y. Jiang, V. Gadepally, and D. Tiwari, “Sprout: Green Generative AI with Carbon-Efficient LLM Inference,” in Proc. 2024 Conf. Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Miami, FL, USA, Nov. 2024, pp. 21799–21813. https://aclanthology.org/2024.emnlp-main.1215/

C. M. Travieso-González, S. Celada-Bernal, A. Lomoschitz, and F. Cabrera-Quintero, “Analysis of variables to determine their influence on renewable energy forecasting using ensemble methods,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 9, p. e30002, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30002

S. Iftikhar, and S. Davy, “Reducing carbon footprint in AI: A framework for sustainable training of large language models,” in Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024, pp. 325–336. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-73110-5_22

C. Springer, and A. Hasanbeigi, “Data Centers in the AI Era: Energy and Emissions Impacts in the U.S. and Key States,” Global Efficiency Intelligence, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.globalefficiencyintel.com/s/GEI-data-centers-report-1152025-clean-E4.pdf

J. Sievers et al., “Federated reinforcement learning for sustainable and cost-efficient energy management,” Energy and AI, vol. 21, p. 100521, Sep. 2025. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666546825000539

D. Thakur, A. Guzzo, G. Fortino, and F. Piccialli, “Green Federated Learning: A New Era of green aware AI,” ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 1–36, Mar.2025. https://dl.acm.org/doi/full/10.1145/3718363

N. Osman and M. d’Inverno, “A Computational Framework for Human Values,” in Proc. 23rd Int. Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2024), Auckland, New Zealand, May. 6–10, 2024, pp. 1531–1539. https://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/37360/

P. Radanliev, “AI ethics: Integrating transparency, fairness, and privacy in AI development,” Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 39, no. 1, Feb. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2025.2463722

L. Deck, J. Schoeffer, M. De-Arteaga, and N. Kühl, “A Critical Survey on Fairness Benefits of Explainable AI,” in Proc. ACM Conf. on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT ’24), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Jun. 3–6, 2024, pp. 1579–1595. https://facctconference.org/static/papers24/facct24-105.pdf

S. Gowaikar, H. Berard, R. Mushkani, and S. Koseki, “From Efficiency to Equity: Measuring Fairness in Preference Learning,” 2024, arXiv:2410.18841. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.18841

A. González, J. Castaño, X. Franch, and S. Martínez-Fernández, “Impact of ML optimization tactics on greener pre-trained ML models,” Computing, vol. 107, no. 4, p. 103, Apr. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-025-01437-8

V. Mishra, D. Saxena, K. Gupta, S. Patni, and A. K. Singh, “Sustainability in large language model supply chains-insights and recommendations using analysis of utility for affecting factors,” Sci. Rep., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 33524, Sep. 2025. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-17937-8

How to Cite
[1]
C. M. Travieso-González, “Towards Conscious AI: The Role of Computer Sciences in the Energy, Social, and Ethical Sustainability of Artificial Intelligence”, TecnoL., vol. 28, no. 64, Dec. 2025.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2025-12-05
Section
Editorial
Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views
Crossref Cited-by logo

Some similar items: